Mold-less blowforming of architectural thermoplastics could enable lightweight structures, material savings, efficient prefabrication means, and on-site adaptive assembly, while introducing rich and non-prescriptive shape transformations. However, shaping control demands real-time responsiveness and flexibility which is lacking in traditional mold-based and artisanal shaping methods.


To overcome these limitations, this research introduces a workflow for mold-free robotic blowforming and recursively aggregating hollow thermoplastic components made from Fused Granular Fabrication (FGF)-printed polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG). Similar preforms undergo different inflation behaviors by responsive blowforming in our methodology transforming into components that can be recursively assembled into architectural-scale systems such as partitions, arches, or vaults, adapting on-site to variable orientation, density, and configuration to their local context.


The virtual workflow integrates physics-based inflation simulation, depth sensing for robotic pick-and-place operations, and thermal feedback for real-time toolpath adaptation during localized heating. In our integrated fabrication a custom robotic end-effector, equipped with pneumatic inflation, adaptive gripping, and a depth-sensing technology, autonomously handles preforms for local heating before final adaptive inflation and precise spatial placement.


This feedback-driven fabrication approach reduces dependency on heavy, expensive, and rigid molds as well as in analog human intervention, presenting a scalable and automated alternative to conventional prefabrication. Results demonstrate predictable deformation outcomes, efficient recursive aggregation, minimal material waste through targeted heating, and rapid, scalable production. By enabling real-time customization and responsive assembly, the work advances robotic-assisted architectural fabrication, offering significant potential for real-time customization and responsive spatial assembly.
The setup uses two independent air lines: one delivers a steady 10 psi to the SMC-MHL2 parallel gripper for securely holding 3D-printed parts, while the other manages inflation with a digitally controlled pressure range of 1–10 psi via an Arduino-connected regulator for precise blow-forming.

The customized finger design features a notch that interlocks with the desktop-printed preform, securing it during robotic movement. A ¼” metal airline pipe is mounted alongside the gripper for inflation. An Intel RealSense LiDAR L515 Camera, aligned with the tool’s TCP, scans the preform and imports point cloud data into Grasshopper through the RADii Capture plug-in. The data is processed by Z-value sorting to detect and localize the preform geometry.

The robotic system is composed of the following interconnecting modules : (1) heating station, (2) assembly station, (3) air control station, (4) robot control center, and (5) wire and piping system. 
The heating station is composed of a heat gun, a thermal camera, a webcam, a robot arm, and a gripper. The goal is to execute precise heating behavior on 3d printed PETG pieces, ensuring repetitiveness and precision in localized inflation behaviors.
The assembly station is composed of a robot arm and a customized end-effector, which includes a real sense depth camera, a gripper with a customized head, and an air pipe. The integrated end-effector would allow the robot to automate the pick and place process, realize accurate positioning, and assemble aligned with digital design.
The air control station is composed of two sets of control systems, one for the gripper and one for inflation. Each of them requires a different pressure range, control accuracy, and control method.
The Robot control center is composed of a robot pendant and a robot controller, which allows direct operation through the control panel. This provides an alternative method to control customized tools without relying on a computer interface and programming. 
There are 3 distinct sets of wire and pipe systems. One for information communication(marked in red), one for air pipelines(marked in blue),  and one for power supply(marked in black, which includes electrical power and air source.
Based on previous experiments, we observed that identical heating paths and conditions could 
still result in varying heating outcomes. We postulated that environment variables like laboratory temperature, ventilation, and human activities likely impacted the surface temperature of regions 
of a preform, varying its blowform inflation behavior. To mitigate these differences, a real-time 
heating method was developed that incorporated feedback from thermal camera monitoring, involving the following steps: 
1) An initial robot tool path is executed to ensure rapid heat-up of a preform’s target region.  
2) A FLIR thermal camera monitors the surface temperature of the preform, mapping this in 
color.
3) As the camera has no live data output, a webcam captures the camera screen’s thermal 
imaging and sends that image data to a computer  
4) Image processing identifies regions with different temperature distribution   using the k-means 
clustering method. 
5) An updated heating path is generated that adapts to identified regions on the preform that are 
below the desired temperature for blowforming.  
6) The robot executes the newly planned toolpath, providing additional localized heating to the 
preform. 
7) A new thermal image is then captured and steps 3 to 6 are repeated until the specified preform 
region has reached the desired blowform temperature. 
Without using any connection hardware, bonding between parts was achieved solely through the 
heating of each preform. Specifically, two or more parts were fused together after one part was 
locally heated. The application of internal air pressure in a heated preform further also enabled 
the heated part to partially engulf or infill parts it was bonding to, enhancing interfacial contact 
and adhesion (Figure 18). Parts relative orientations to one another greatly impact the surface 
area of each bond, suggesting further research should be undertaken to evaluate both geometrical 
and surface area criteria for bonds with greater adhesive strength.  
This research presents an integrated robotic workflow for moldless blowforming and adaptive, recursive assembly of PETG thermoplastic components, advancing automation, adaptability, and precision in blowformed thermoplastic assemblies. Localized heating and blowforming at the point of assembly enable scaling beyond what is demonstrated, without requiring larger robotic equipment. Combining real-time thermal feedback, depth sensing, and custom robotic tooling, the system achieves substantial control over localized inflation and spatial assembly without molds, scaffolding, or fasteners. 

While this research establishes proof of concept, the approach currently faces limitations in achieving absolute precision across repeated heating cycles to ensure predictable preform inflation under varying environmental conditions. To address this, enhancements to sensor precision and computational models are required, accounting for factors such as temperature, wind direction, and velocity. Future research should explore complex preform geometries, such as non-polar or branching structures, to enhance aggregation and broaden robotic blowforming possibilities. Additionally, detailed studies into optimized air pressure patterns, thermal dynamics, and advanced computational modeling would further establish a robust predictive framework for blowformed assemblages. 

Architectural-scale applications should also be explored, where automated, site-responsive assembly of thermoplastic parts may benefit adaptive rebuilding, restoration, or lightweight temporary structures. This study aims to inspire and provide a foundation for further research into live-adaptive robotic assembly practices, where dynamic material formation processes have, to date, been prohibitively challenging to pursue outside the factory environment. 
Master of Science in Design: Robotics and Autonomous Systems (MSD-RAS)
Weiztman School of Design, University of Pennsylvania

ARCH 802 Material Agencies III_ Spring Semester
Instructors: Robert Stuart-Smith & Nathan King & Laia Mogas-Soldevila & Jeffrey Anderson
TAs: Mahsa Masalegoo & Franklin Wu
MSD-RAS Program Director: Robert Stuart-Smith
ARI Robotics Lab Operators: Nicholas Sideropoulos & Shunta Moriuchi
Team Lobster: BurcuGocen, BeikelRivas, QingyangXu, ZitongRen

You may also like

Back to Top